Why We Prefer the Hardstyle Swing
Posted by Gray Cook
Our previous discussion of Strength ended with a challenge to develop a better, more applicable definition of the word.
When we look at the definition posted by Merriam-Webster for strength as a noun, the very first meaning is “the quality or state of being strong, capacity for exertion or endurance.” If we look deeper at exertion and endurance, we wind up using the words work capacity.
The reason I challenged the word strength in the first place was because I found myself working with Lee Burton and Dan John on Essentials of Coaching and Training Functional Continuums and pulling in commentary from strength coaches like Jon Torine and Alwyn Cosgrove on the entire concept of taking strength, pressing it hard and seeing if work capacity comes out. I think we can all hold ourselves to a better standard of communication and accountability if we use strength that way and don’t simply value it as a series of lifts.
Unless you are lifting because powerlifting is your sport, you’re lifting for some other benefit. Whether it’s simply fitness, preparation for ski season, preparation for boot camp or some other hobby or physical activity, we should be able to agree that work capacity will allow you to develop more skill because you have more resistance to fatigue—your practice time will be not only filled with volume but integrity as well.
If you could test work capacity without lifting then you could make a great case for lifting. If you need to lift to test work capacity, then you eliminate some strong non-lifters. If you need to lift with good technique, then you eliminate lots of gym rats as well.
You take a test to know what to practice—not so you can practice the test.
For more on this concept, check out this clip from my new DVD. | |
When Dan and I approached this topic in Essentials of Coaching and Training Functional Continuums, the biggest problem area, obstacle and point of controversy that emerged is the fact that following bodyweight competence and movement pattern competency, we go into loaded patterning.
Biologically, that’s not what happens. Babies carry things before they try to lift their max load. Sub-max lifts with carries are actually preferred by nature and biological development over simple repetitions of lifting things in newly-acquired loaded patterns.
When people with a dysfunctional pattern on their movement screen do corrective strategies and jump right into a lift that looks like that pattern, there’s a “hiccup.” If I’ve done anything to make that glitch, I apologize for it publicly—because we should not arbitrarily impose loads on a pattern that has only been vetted at body weight.
We should see what your endurance and your integrity look like under load in a very low complexity movement, like a Farmer’s Walk, a front rack carry, an overhead carry or even a segment or the whole Turkish Getup. If we can value these vertical and horizontal carries, these symmetrical and asymmetrical carries, then I think we will demonstrate how long someone’s integrity will last under load.
From that base of carries, we can pursue the appropriate lifts that are needed to make the individual balanced in the left and right side of work capacity, the front and back side of work capacity and in the upper and lower allocation of work capacity. When we go for a balanced body, we quarter the whole thing. Look at the Y Balance Test and you’ll see where we’re coming from.
I challenged the word stability quite some time ago in my book Movement, stating that all we were doing with the word stability is really strength—sets and repetitions to small muscle groups. That’s not what stability is.
Stability is more about timing than it is about strength so we substitute the words motor control and they work very well. It keeps you on the mark and it helps you hit the bull’s eye because when you find a lack of motor control, you do the things that foster motor control. When you find a lack of stability, you simply ask which muscle group controls this movement and how many sets and repetitions you think it will take to regain it.
How many sets and repetitions of finger flexion do you think it will take to get you playing a piano?
There is no answer because it’s the wrong question. Playing the piano creates the timing and coordination that create the motor control to allow you to play a piano. It’s not about strength at the motor control level. It’s about alignment with integrity under load.
That’s what carries do for you—almost automatically if the posture is correct. If the starting posture is correct, your job is to gauge a carry cycle that lasts between one and three minutes. Adjust the loads appropriately. Adjust the postures appropriately. Make sure that they don’t have any ‘1s’ on the movement screen—if so, you’ve probably got a severe motor control problem or an underlying mobility problem. With these, you shouldn’t even be pursuing motor control until you know what you’re shooting at.
If we kill stability and replace it with motor control, and we kill strength and replace it with work capacity, then hopefully no one will be offended. The whole point of strength is not to create a word that’s a golden calf and let it become the thing that we strive for.
Work capacity is what we strive for in our human endeavors and strength is a key attribute that helps work capacity. At the right time and the right place, lifting is one of the most effective things to promote work capacity, but if lifting creates inappropriate side effects or somehow undermines work capacity, then strength is an empty word. Anybody can say they have it.
Let’s protect the nobility of words like strength and stability. For a short time, let’s impose a more correct title to what we want to gain by doing stability work or strength work. Let’s call them motor control and work capacity. Let’s not hide behind a term that doesn’t have metrics and values that enable us to demonstrate our improvement or effectiveness in one attribute without unnecessary or complicating side effects.
I hope that I haven’t offended anybody. If I’ve challenged you to think outside the box, it’s the same challenge that I imposed on myself when I started confronting this term, trying to be more truthful with myself and the work that I do.
Posted by Gray Cook
Posted by Eric D'Agati
Posted by Gray Cook
Posted by Eric D'Agati
Posted by Gray Cook
Hello Mr Gray,
Yah, that definition of strength at the beginning is wrong. I think Strength=Force against an external load. It is a variable in the Work equation. Work (newton*meters) = Force (newtons) x Displacement (meters). Throw in a time component and you have Power.
This is excellent information! I look forward to further discussion on this topic with my colleagues and students.
玻璃钢生产厂家蚌埠户外玻璃钢雕塑定制沈阳小区玻璃钢雕塑厂家白沙广场玻璃钢卡通人物雕塑临沧市玻璃钢雕塑订做玻璃钢花盆透气性怎么样南京玻璃钢花盆座椅鑫益玻璃钢人物雕塑吉林步行街玻璃钢雕塑销售电话山东景观玻璃钢雕塑设计阿克苏商场美陈玻璃钢雕塑摆件可爱邳州玻璃钢雕塑厂安阳仿木玻璃钢雕塑维修玻璃钢雕塑香港玻璃钢人物雕塑厂家南阳玻璃钢人物雕塑定制价格淮南景区玻璃钢雕塑多少钱海南屯昌县创意玻璃钢雕塑郑州人物玻璃钢卡通雕塑设计无锡玻璃钢卡通雕塑报价宁夏动物玻璃钢雕塑多少钱九江玻璃钢花盆花器瑞丽市玻璃钢雕塑设计价格表信阳玻璃钢雕塑定制价格玻璃钢吗雕塑阳江商场玻璃钢雕塑惠州led发光玻璃钢雕塑工艺邯郸景观园林玻璃钢仿铜雕塑资阳玻璃钢雕塑公司鸡西雕塑玻璃钢卡通香港通过《维护国家安全条例》两大学生合买彩票中奖一人不认账让美丽中国“从细节出发”19岁小伙救下5人后溺亡 多方发声单亲妈妈陷入热恋 14岁儿子报警汪小菲曝离婚始末遭遇山火的松茸之乡雅江山火三名扑火人员牺牲系谣言何赛飞追着代拍打萧美琴窜访捷克 外交部回应卫健委通报少年有偿捐血浆16次猝死手机成瘾是影响睡眠质量重要因素高校汽车撞人致3死16伤 司机系学生315晚会后胖东来又人满为患了小米汽车超级工厂正式揭幕中国拥有亿元资产的家庭达13.3万户周杰伦一审败诉网易男孩8年未见母亲被告知被遗忘许家印被限制高消费饲养员用铁锨驱打大熊猫被辞退男子被猫抓伤后确诊“猫抓病”特朗普无法缴纳4.54亿美元罚金倪萍分享减重40斤方法联合利华开始重组张家界的山上“长”满了韩国人?张立群任西安交通大学校长杨倩无缘巴黎奥运“重生之我在北大当嫡校长”黑马情侣提车了专访95后高颜值猪保姆考生莫言也上北大硕士复试名单了网友洛杉矶偶遇贾玲专家建议不必谈骨泥色变沉迷短剧的人就像掉进了杀猪盘奥巴马现身唐宁街 黑色着装引猜测七年后宇文玥被薅头发捞上岸事业单位女子向同事水杯投不明物质凯特王妃现身!外出购物视频曝光河南驻马店通报西平中学跳楼事件王树国卸任西安交大校长 师生送别恒大被罚41.75亿到底怎么缴男子被流浪猫绊倒 投喂者赔24万房客欠租失踪 房东直发愁西双版纳热带植物园回应蜉蝣大爆发钱人豪晒法院裁定实锤抄袭外国人感慨凌晨的中国很安全胖东来员工每周单休无小长假白宫:哈马斯三号人物被杀测试车高速逃费 小米:已补缴老人退休金被冒领16年 金额超20万